• H&R Moderators: VerbalTruist | cdin | Lil'LinaptkSix

The Dangers of Mercury: A Rant

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lady Codone

Bluelighter
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
2,132
People talk about fluoride in the water, trans fat in our food, smog in the air, radon in our homes, and the harmful effects of PCBs, dioxin, food additives, cigarette smoke, lead, alcohol and drugs, and carcinogens, teratogens, and mutagens of every color, but the second anyone mentions the dangers of mercury in amalgams and vaccinations, they get labeled a cooky conspiracy theorist/hypochondriac. Why is this?

Mercury is the single most toxic non-radioactive element in existence--more harmful than even lead or arsenic--causing electrical disruptions in the brain, neurodegeneration, nerve cell death, and undoubtedly a whole host of health/behavioral problems. It was responsible for acrodynia, which killed hundreds of babies until it was removed from teething powders in the 1930s; Minamata disease, which caused horrific birth defects and deaths in Asia; Mad Hatter's Syndrome, causing nervousness and Parkinson-like symptoms in hat makers exposed to it; mercury poisoning in Iraqis who ate tainted grain in the '70s, and countless other outbreaks of illness and death throughout history.

In recent times, it's been implicated in playing a role in autism spectrum disorders and triggering multiple sclerosis, alzheimer's disease, mental illness, chronic fatigue, Lou Gehrig's disease, and literally hundreds of other serious diseases. The evidence comes from studies on people with multiple amalgam fillings, thimerosal-laced vaccines, and high levels of mercury in the blood, as well as studies on the effect of mercury on human cells in labs. Added to what we already know about mercury, these studies point to one very troubling conclusion: that mercury is a major contributing factor behind many modern ailments like autoimmune disease and mental illness despite what we're told by the FDA.

The point of this rant is to encourage you to learn everything you can about this deadly toxin and to not brush it off as "just another health risk that can't be avoided." It can't be avoided entirely, but the less of it in your system, the better off you'll be. You don't have to rip out all your silver fillings, stop eating fish or go out of your way not to get vaccinated, but there are some simple things you can do to prevent unnecessary exposure:

1. Tell your dentist to use composite fillings instead of amalgams. If you already have amalgams, make a point to replace them with composites when the time comes to get new fillings. If you're really concerned, there are mercury-literate dentists who will safely remove your amalgams and replace them with less toxic substances, though it can be difficult to find qualified dentists and can be expensive.

2. Limit your intake of large fish--tuna, swordfish, salmon, etc.--to once a month, and don't eat fish in excess of 3x per week. Smaller fish are generally less contaminated, and you can reduce the amount of mercury by not allowing fish to cook in their own juices. Don't eliminate fish from your diet entirely, as they're an important source of healthy EFAs and other nutrients.

3. Read the package inserts on all vaccines you receive. Request thimerosal-free versions of any shots you or your children get, and try to break up multiple vaccines (like the MMR or DPT) into several doses, by taking the measles shot one day, the mumps another, and rubella at a later date and so on. Though the MMR has never contained thimerosal, it's been suggested that vaccines containing multiple viruses can overwhelm the immune system, especially in babies and children.

4. Know your sources. Besides seafood, amalgams and vaccinations--which are the 3 biggest sources of exposure--Mercury can be found in computers, fluorescent lightbulbs, old thermometers, barometers, skin bleaching creams, some contact lens solutions and eyedrops, some nasal sprays, high fructose corn syrup, tobacco smoke, some pesticides, and a number of other products. Dispose of fluorescent lights, old computers, thermometers, etc. properly to avoid exposure, and buy thimerosal-free medicines and food products.

5. Look into chelation as a treatment for mercury toxicity. Chelation is the only effective method of removing mercury and other toxic metals from the body, though it can be dangerous if done improperly. I suggest liquid Zeolite by Waiora, which is an excellent chelator that's safe and relatively cheap. Cilantro, alpha lipoic acid, vitamin C, EDTA, DMPS, and DMSO are also effective methods of chelation.

If anyone has any other helpful info to add, please feel free. If this subject doesn't interest you or you're going to argue without doing your reseach first, don't bother. I'm not here to argue about whether mercury causes autism or anything else, but you're free to voice your opinion.

{End rant.}
 
^^^Good informative post! The good thing is they don't put it in our water like fluoride, (lol) not forced upon us, except in dentistry.
 
Dipicolinic acid, an alkaloid found in miso binds to heavy metals and allows them to be eliminated from the body. Eating miso helps people eliminate things like mercury, uranium, strontium etc.
 
Dipicolinic acid, an alkaloid found in miso binds to heavy metals and allows them to be eliminated from the body. Eating miso helps people eliminate things like mercury, uranium, strontium etc.
>>>Nibiru, you are a wealth of info, thank you!


>Here is some more info on miso:

A number of important benefits are:

• Ability to chelate* heavy metals and radiation from the body including radioactive strontium. Miso contains dipicolinic acid. (*discharges them from the body.)

• Beneficial Micro-Organisms to ward off harmful micro-organisms.

• Helps cleanse Nicotine Poisoning

• Helps dissolve Cholesterol Accumulations

• Promotes Resistance to Disease

• Reduces risk of Breast Cancer: Journal of NCI June 18, 2003.

• Relief from effects of too much smoking

• Relief from effects of too much drinking

• Helps prevent allergies

Non-pasteurized Miso contains lactobacilli, enzymes, and other micro-organisms that are beneficial to the body. Lactobacili help protect against pathogenic organisms (such as E. coli bacteria, salmonella, and Shigella). Enzymes enhance digestion and the assimiliation of nutrients. Other components of Miso, such as lecithin, linoleic acid, and isolfavones help maintain a healthy cholesterol level. Studies have found that isoflavones can help prevent hypertension, cardiovascular disease and some types of cancers and can help reduced certain symptoms of menopause.
Miso is a "complete protein" (i.e., it contains all the essential amino acids).
Some studies have found that Miso contains dipicolinic acid and that this is an alkaloid that can help eliminate heavy metals from the body, which can help ease the side effects of radiation therapy.
Miso has a high amount of sodium, zinc, manganese, copper, and phosphorous. Zinc is a cofactor in a wide variety of enzymatic reactions, and zinc is critial to immune function and wound healing. Copper and manganese, two other enzyme cofactors, are essential components of the enzyme, superoxide dismutase, which is important in energy production and antioxidant defenses. Copper is also necessary for the activity of lysyl oxidase, an enzyme involved in cross-linking collagen and elastin, both of which provide the ground substance and flexibility in blood vessels, bones, and joints. Iron is primarily used as part of hemoglobin, the molecule responsible for transporting and releasing oxygen throughout the body. But hemoglobin synthesis also relies on copper. Without copper, iron cannot be properly utilized in red blood cells.
 
definitely something to be aware of, it's hard to realize how serious alzheimer's is until you know someone who has been affected by it.

2. Limit your intake of large fish--tuna, swordfish, salmon, etc.--to once a month, and don't eat fish in excess of 3x per week. Smaller fish are generally less contaminated, and you can reduce the amount of mercury by not allowing fish to cook in their own juices. Don't eliminate fish from your diet entirely, as they're an important source of healthy EFAs and other nutrients.

speaking as someone who's fairly mercury-aware, i know that fresh salmon is amongst the LEAST mercury-contaminated fish [source]. while it's true that smaller fish may be less contaminated individually, per equal dose most are far moreso than salmon.

bentonite is also a well-lauded metals detoxifier. it's a clay that acts like a chelating agent and imho it's good shit, look into it :)
 
I'm taking an alternative photographic processing class at school, and one of the image processes (daguerotyping...one of the first ever invented in the late 18th century) involves using mercury to develop an image.

Apparently most people use iodine now, but some old schooler's still use mercury and the majority of them have been found to have obscene levels of it in their blood :( no beuno.

So how bad is it in seafood? Should I stop eating certain types of fish all together or is it ok to do so infrequently?
 
Mercury bio-accumulates in organisms, and since a lot of mercuric pollution winds up in the ocean, ocean-borne seafood can have high levels of mercury. I Imagine filter feeders would have a bunch in them.
 
Mercury bio-accumulates in organisms, and since a lot of mercuric pollution winds up in the ocean, ocean-borne seafood can have high levels of mercury. I Imagine filter feeders would have a bunch in them.
actually the higher up the foodchain you go the greater proportions of mercury you find. So animals like tuna (near the top of their foodchain) have high mercury contents.
 
If mercury was good enough to poison Isaac Newton, its good enough to poison me! :D
 
Mercury is a vengeful deity. Be sure to provide an extra lamb, grain and grapes for sacrifice upon his altar.
 
This is a list of reasons why most of these concerns about mercury are in tinfoil hat territory.

Dental fillings:

Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2006 Jul;209(4):309-16.
PMID: 16448848

Dental amalgam fillings containing approximately 50% mercury have been used for almost 200 years and have been controversial for almost the same time. Allegations of effects caused by amalgams have involved many diseases. Recent evidence that small amounts of mercury are continuously released from amalgam fillings has fuelled the controversy. This is a comprehensive review of the epidemiologic evidence for the safety of dental amalgam fillings, with an emphasis on methodological issues and identifying gaps in the literature. Studies show little evidence of effects on general chronic disease incidence or mortality. Limited evidence exists for an association with multiple sclerosis, but few studies on either Alzheimer's or Parkinson's diseases. The preponderance of evidence suggests no renal effects and that ill-defined symptom complexes, including chronic fatigue syndrome, are not caused by amalgams. There is little direct evidence that can be used to assess reproductive hazards. Overall, few relevant epidemiologic studies are available. Most prior assessments of possible amalgam health effects have been based on comparisons of dental mercury exposures with occupational exposures causing harm. However, the amalgam-exposed population contains a broader, possibly more susceptible, spectrum of people. Common limitations of population-based studies of dental amalgam effects include inadequate longitudinal exposure assessment and negative confounding by better access to dental care in higher socioeconomic groups. Better designed studies are needed, particularly for investigation of neurodegenerative diseases and effects on infants and children.

I wouldn't freak out over vaccinations, either.

Clinical Infectious Diseases 2009;48:456–461
PMID: 19128068

MMR vaccine:First, the self‐referred cohort did not include control subjects, which precluded the authors from determining whether the occurrence of autism following receipt of MMR vaccine was causal or coincidental. Because 50,000 British children per month received MMR vaccine between ages 1 and 2 years—at a time when autism typically presents—coincidental associations were inevitable. Indeed, given the prevalence of autism in England in 1998 of 1 in 2000 children [2], 25 children per month would receive a diagnosis of the disorder soon after receiving MMR vaccine by chance alone. Second, endoscopic or neuropsychological assessments were not blind, and data were not collected systematically or completely. Third, gastrointestinal symptoms did not predate autism in several children, which is inconsistent with the notion that intestinal inflammation facilitated bloodstream invasion of encephalopathic peptides. Fourth, measles, mumps, or rubella vaccine viruses have not been found to cause chronic intestinal inflammation or loss of intestinal barrier function. Indeed, a recent study by Hornig et al. [3] found that the measles vaccine virus genome was not detected more commonly in children with or without autism. Fifth, putative encephalopathic peptides traveling from the intestine to the brain have never been identified. In contrast, the genes that have been associated with autism spectrum disorder to date have been found to code for endogenous proteins that influence neuronal synapse function, neuronal cell adhesion, neuronal activity regulation, or endosomal trafficking [4].
In California, researchers compared year‐specific MMR vaccination rates of kindergarten students with the yearly autism case load of the California Department of Developmental Services during 1980–1994 [8]. As was observed in the United Kingdom, the increase in the number of autism diagnoses did not correlate with MMR vaccination rates.


In Canada, researchers estimated the prevalence of pervasive developmental disorder with respect to MMR vaccination in 27,749 children from 55 schools in Quebec [9]. Autism rates increased coincident with a decrease in MMR vaccination rates. The results were unchanged when both exposure and outcome definitions varied, including a strict diagnosis of autism.

There is no evidence whatsoever for a link between thimerosal and autism.
In Sweden and Denmark, researchers found a relatively stable incidence of autism when thimerosal‐containing vaccines were in use (1980–1990), including years when children were exposed to as much as 200 μg of ethylmercury (concentrations similar to peak US exposures) [22]. However, in 1990, a steady increase in the incidence of autism began in both countries and continued through the end of the study period in 2000, despite the removal of thimerosal from vaccines in 1992.


In Denmark, researchers performed a study comparing the incidence of autism in children who had received 200 μg (1961–1970), 125 μg (1970–1992), or 0 μg of thimerosal (1992–2000) and again demonstrated no relationship between thimerosal exposure and autism [23].

Vague ideas about "too many vaccines at once":

Vaccines do not overwhelm the immune system. Although the infant immune system is relatively naive, it is immediately capable of generating a vast array of protective responses; even conservative estimates predict the capacity to respond to thousands of vaccines simultaneously [30]. Consistent with this theoretical exercise, combinations of vaccines induce immune responses comparable to those given individually [31]. Also, although the number of recommended childhood vaccines has increased during the past 30 years, with advances in protein chemistry and recombinant DNA technology, the immunologic load has actually decreased. The 14 vaccines given today contain <200 bacterial and viral proteins or polysaccharides, compared with >3000 of these immunological components in the 7 vaccines administered in 1980 [30]. Further, vaccines represent a minute fraction of what a child’s immune system routinely navigates; the average child is infected with 4–6 viruses per year [32]. The immune response elicited from the vast antigen exposure of unattenuated viral replication supersedes that of even multiple, simultaneous vaccines.

Autism is not an immune‐mediated disease. Unlike autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis, there is no evidence of immune activation or inflammatory lesions in the CNS of people with autism [38]. In fact, current data suggest that genetic variation in neuronal circuitry that affects synaptic development might in part account for autistic behavior [39]. Thus, speculation that an exaggerated or inappropriate immune response to vaccination precipitates autism is at variance with current scientific data that address the pathogenesis of autism.

Chelation therapy is...dubious:

Medscape J Med. 2008 May 13;10(5):115.Click here to read
PMID: 18596934

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) was begun in 2003 and is expected to be completed in 2009. It is a trial of office-based, intravenous disodium ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid (Na(2)EDTA) as a treatment for coronary artery disease (CAD). A few case series in the 1950s and early 1960s had found Na(2)EDTA to be ineffective for CAD or peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Nevertheless, a few hundred physicians, almost all of whom advocate other dubious treatments, continued to peddle chelation as an office treatment. They claim that chelation dramatically improves symptoms and prolongs life in 80% to 90% of patients. In response, academics performed 4 controlled trials during the 1990s. None favored chelation, but chelationists repudiated those findings.We have investigated the method and the trial. We present our findings in 4 parts: history, origin and nature of the TACT, state of the evidence, and risks. We present evidence that chelationists and their organization, the American College for Advancement in Medicine, used political connections to pressure the NIH to fund the TACT. The TACT protocols justified the trial by misrepresenting case series and by ignoring evidence of risks. The trial employs nearly 100 unfit co-investigators. It conflates disodium EDTA and another, somewhat safer drug. It lacks precautions necessary to minimize risks. The consent form reflects those shortcomings and fails to disclose apparent proprietary interests. The trial's outcome will be unreliable and almost certainly equivocal, thus defeating its stated purpose.We conclude that the TACT is unethical, dangerous, pointless, and wasteful. It should be abandoned.
 
Yes, great topic again. Maybe we should just grab the periodic table and list all the dangers?
 
I've known bodybuilders who ate up to 10 cans of tuna/day.

I'll admit, they were all psychopaths, but I don't blame the fish...
 
For those questioning the mercury-autism link, research the Simpsonwood conference in 2000 and tell me what you find.

I'm in no way asserting that mercury alone causes all cases of autism, but mercury poisoning and autism share a frightening number of symptoms, right down to some of the most bizarre behaviors like "hand flapping" and "toe walking". Acrodynia (mercury poisoning in babies/children prior to the 1950s) and autism share a lot of symptoms too. Not only that, but if you look at the incidence rate of autism, it coincides EXACTLY with the changes in the vaccine schedule for infants and newborns, which now includes somewhere around 30 shots before age 5, whereas it used to only include about 5. The timing of symptom onset alone is enough to make parents of autistic children suspect a vaccine link, and if you read the side effects of most vaccines, you'll see that encephalitis, high-pitched crying/fever, loss of appetite, and other brain-related side effects are not uncommon (but are underreported).

If you haven't already, I suggest you read "Evidence of Harm" by David Kirby. It discusses how not only mercury, but an excess of vaccines in general can stress the immature immune system of children, leading to behavior problems, developmental disorders, autoimmune disease, and general ill health. It gives a detailed account of the legal proceedings hundreds of parents endured to get the evidence to even be considered by the CDC. (One woman even received harrassing phone calls and emails from government officials on more than one occasion for her outspoken views on the subject).

At any rate, I'm not trying to change anyone's view on the subject, as I know that's a futile effort. What I am trying to do is increase awareness about a harmful substance that's still being used in everyday products and procedures when it doesn't have to be. Mercury has been banned and taken out of paint, teething powder, thermometers, and hundreds of other products because of proven ill effects on health, but is still being installed in millions of peoples' heads not 3 inches from their brains. Does this make any sense to you? Why are we shooting our newborns and infants full of a known neurotoxin when there are other safer alternatives?

Whether or not mercury causes autism is not the real issue here, it's about accountability and doing what's right even if it means admitting you were wrong or losing money, both of which have and will continue to prevent government health officials from being 100% forthcoming on the issue.
 
At any rate, I'm not trying to change anyone's view on the subject, as I know that's a futile effort. What I am trying to do is increase awareness about a harmful substance that's still being used in everyday products and procedures when it doesn't have to be.

thereby changing people's views by driving them to quack science sites. :\
 
I dunno man. I don't fucking care about autism or whatever. I just don't want mercury, arsenic, lead or strontium in my body. C'mon now. I think anybody with half a brain knows mercury should be avoided.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top